The other day, I read
about a company making electronic shelf labels (sometimes also referred to as
digital price tags) that is prototyping the use of RF-based charging to deliver
energy to these labels.
This is a good news
for the young long-range wireless power industry.
The problem being
solved is real. A typical US store might have 50,000 such electronic labels. If
they last 5 years on a battery, this means that on average 10,000 labels have
their battery run out every year. If you were a maintenance crew that worked
250 days a year, you’d need to replace 40 such batteries or labels every day.
That’s a lot of work.
I also think RF
charging could be a good fit. Here’s why:
Electronic shelf
labels require a tiny bit of energy, and thus are within the range that can be
delivered using RF power.
Let’s make a technical
back-of-the-envelope calculation: SES-Imagotag is a leading company in the
digital price tag space. They publish specifications of their tags on the Web
site. For instance, their G-Tag S4 label says that it uses a CR2450 coin
Lithium battery and it is rated to last 5 years at 2 updates a day. These
labels use epaper so they don’t require energy to sustain the display, just to
update it.
A CR2450 battery is a
3V battery with a capacity of about 610 mAh, so total capacity of 1.83 Watt
Hour (WH). Dividing this over 5 years and 365 days a year, it comes out that
the required power is approx 0.001 WH per day, or 1 milliwatt hour per day.
Thus, if you are able to deliver 1 mW for one hour each day, you can sustain
this display ‘forever’.
In contrast, a low-end
model of the Wi-Charge power transmitter can deliver approx 24 WH per day, so
enough energy to serve about 20,000 labels, if there was a good way to get this
energy to each label.
Electronic shelf
labels are spread throughout the store, so a technology that ‘floods’ the space
is helpful.
Putting safety
considerations aside, if you think about RF wireless energy like radio waves that flood
the space, very small amounts of energy can reach around obstacles. Thus, they
may be able to deliver these tiny amounts of energy even to labels that are
hidden on a bottom shelf.
In contrast, IR wireless
charging works best as a point-to-point mechanism. This is advantageous when it
comes to power, range, efficiency and safety, but does present some challenges
(which can be solved) when trying to deliver energy for a label that is hidden
from view.
RF wireless power RF wireless energy
RF wireless power RF wireless energy
Very informative post..
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing..
RF wireless power